Make your contribution easy to identify
Before
Worked on the onboarding project.
With the missing detail
Mapped signup drop-offs against support tickets, then redesigned the first-project setup with Design and Engineering.
Find unclear sentences, missing evidence, and repeated wording with a resume score and section-by-section feedback.
Before
Worked on the onboarding project.
With the missing detail
Mapped signup drop-offs against support tickets, then redesigned the first-project setup with Design and Engineering.
Before
Improved the weekly reporting process.
With the missing detail
Replaced spreadsheet consolidation with a checked SQL report, reducing weekly preparation from four hours to one across the next six reporting cycles.
Before
A highly motivated team player who successfully collaborated with various stakeholders.
With the missing detail
Aligned Support and Engineering on a shared incident handoff: affected customers, reproduction steps, and the owner of the next update.
Use your own experience and verified results in these examples.
Product manager
I was responsible for making suggestions for product improvements based on user feedback.
Writing issues found: 1
Review each correction and apply the ones you want.
01
Work experience
Remove repeated wording and lead with the action.
Original
Suggested correction
The score is feedback on the current document, not a prediction of an offer. Read the section-level evidence before deciding what to change.
Link to this explanationCan a reader identify the problem, your own responsibility, the action, and the work scope? A named deliverable is more informative than “responsible for various tasks.”
Look for an observable change and a defensible connection to your work. A measured number needs a period and baseline; an unmeasured outcome can still describe a shipped change or resolved problem.
Check whether a recruiter can follow each sentence without decoding vague verbs, unexplained abbreviations, or repeated claims. Preserve important technical context when shortening.
When a target job is provided, a separate target-fit review compares its requirements with resume evidence. It is not one of the specificity, impact, and clarity writing axes, and relevance to one posting is not a universal measure of career quality.
Confirm that the imported text, current resume version, and target job are correct. Missing source text can lead to feedback about an omission that only happened during import.
Open the feedback attached to a weak claim. Add the missing ownership, context, or result only when you can support it; do not invent a metric to raise a score.
Keep the target and source material stable when comparing revisions. Changes in a model, prompt, document, or job can affect the result; a small score difference is not proof of a better hiring outcome.
Use this example to understand the review, then check your own source material.
Illustrative review
Instead of “Improved reporting,” explain: “Replaced a manual CSV merge with a scheduled report, added duplicate-record checks, and compared the output with the finance team before handover.” The added value is ownership and verification, not an invented percentage.
Shows the product feedback described here. These are refresh.cv review criteria, not an employer certification or an independently validated hiring predictor.
Get your score and section feedback. Fill in missing evidence and refine unclear sentences.